Riadok 59: | Riadok 59: | ||
|Toward embodied cognition. | |Toward embodied cognition. | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Wilson M. (2002) | + | ♦ Wilson M. (2002) |
[http://www.indiana.edu/~cogdev/labwork/WilsonSixViewsofEmbodiedCog.pdf Six views of embodied cognition]. <i>Psychonomics Bulletin Review,</i> 9(4), 625-636. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/wilson.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | [http://www.indiana.edu/~cogdev/labwork/WilsonSixViewsofEmbodiedCog.pdf Six views of embodied cognition]. <i>Psychonomics Bulletin Review,</i> 9(4), 625-636. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/wilson.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | ||
− | ♦ Ziemke T. (2003) | + | ♦ Ziemke T. (2003) |
[http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/244.pdf What's that thing called embodiment?] | [http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/244.pdf What's that thing called embodiment?] | ||
<i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139. | <i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139. | ||
Riadok 71: | Riadok 71: | ||
|Mirror neuron system and its role(s) in cognition. | |Mirror neuron system and its role(s) in cognition. | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010) | + | ♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]--> <br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]--> <br> | ||
− | ♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014) | + | ♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014) |
[https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0169 Mirror neuron research: the past and the future.] <i>Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., </i>369: 20130169.<br> | [https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0169 Mirror neuron research: the past and the future.] <i>Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., </i>369: 20130169.<br> | ||
<!--Giese M. & Rizzolatti G. (2015). | <!--Giese M. & Rizzolatti G. (2015). | ||
Riadok 84: | Riadok 84: | ||
<!--♦ Jeannerod M.J. (2001). | <!--♦ Jeannerod M.J. (2001). | ||
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/jeannerod.simul-action.nimg01.pdf Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition], <i>NeuroImage</i>, 14, 103–109, doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 <br>--> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/jeannerod.simul-action.nimg01.pdf Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition], <i>NeuroImage</i>, 14, 103–109, doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832 <br>--> | ||
− | ♦ Smith A.H. (2006) | + | ♦ Smith A.H. (2006) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/smith.motor-cogn-simul.chap06.pdf Motor cognition and mental simulation]. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481. <br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/smith.motor-cogn-simul.chap06.pdf Motor cognition and mental simulation]. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481. <br> | ||
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/knez.motor-cog.pdf">Simon K.</a>)<br--> | <!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/knez.motor-cog.pdf">Simon K.</a>)<br--> | ||
− | ♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013) | + | ♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press <br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press <br> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Riadok 95: | Riadok 95: | ||
<!--br>/ Indre <a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/indre.pileckyte.pdf">slides/a>---> | <!--br>/ Indre <a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/indre.pileckyte.pdf">slides/a>---> | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002) | + | ♦ Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.lang-action.psychrevbul02.pdf Grounding language in action]. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,</i> 9(3), 558-565. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/glenberg.lang-action.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.lang-action.psychrevbul02.pdf Grounding language in action]. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,</i> 9(3), 558-565. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/glenberg.lang-action.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | ||
<!--♦ Pulvermueller F. (2005) | <!--♦ Pulvermueller F. (2005) | ||
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/pulvermueller.lang-action.nrn05.pdf Brain mechanisms linking language and action]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 6(7), 576-582.<br>--> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/pulvermueller.lang-action.nrn05.pdf Brain mechanisms linking language and action]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 6(7), 576-582.<br>--> | ||
− | ♦ Arbib M., Gasser B., Barrès V. (2014) | + | ♦ Arbib M., Gasser B., Barrès V. (2014) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/arbib.lang-emb.npsy14.pdf Language is handy but is it embodied?]. <i>Neuropsychologia,</i> 55, 57–70. | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/arbib.lang-emb.npsy14.pdf Language is handy but is it embodied?]. <i>Neuropsychologia,</i> 55, 57–70. | ||
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/reichl.arbib.pdf">Dominik R.</a>)<br--> | <!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/reichl.arbib.pdf">Dominik R.</a>)<br--> | ||
Riadok 108: | Riadok 108: | ||
<!--a href="Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | <!--a href="Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008) | + | ♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | ||
− | ♦ Evans V. (2009) | + | ♦ Evans V. (2009) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/evans.lccm.ch09.pdf Semantic representation in LCCM Theory]. In: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By V. Evans & S. Pourcel. John Benjamins. | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/evans.lccm.ch09.pdf Semantic representation in LCCM Theory]. In: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By V. Evans & S. Pourcel. John Benjamins. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|06.11. | |06.11. | ||
− | | | + | |Role(s) of language in cognition. |
<!--a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/farkas-etal.icub.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | <!--a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/farkas-etal.icub.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009) | + | ♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009) |
[http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001<br> | [http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001<br> | ||
♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015) | ♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015) | ||
Riadok 127: | Riadok 127: | ||
♦ Steels L. (2008) | ♦ Steels L. (2008) | ||
[https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | [https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | ||
− | ♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013) | + | ♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013) |
+ | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/coradeschi.sgp-review.ki13.pdf A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems]. <i>Künstliche Intelligenz</i>, 27:129–136 <br> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|20.11. | |20.11. | ||
Riadok 133: | Riadok 134: | ||
<!--a href="Slides/covariation.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | <!--a href="Slides/covariation.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008) | + | ♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008) |
[http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Latent_semantic_analysis Latent semantic analysis],<i> Scholarpedia</i>, 3(11):4356. | [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Latent_semantic_analysis Latent semantic analysis],<i> Scholarpedia</i>, 3(11):4356. | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki]<br> | [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki]<br> | ||
Riadok 150: | Riadok 151: | ||
<!--a href="Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | <!--a href="Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf">slides</a--> | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦ Louwerse M. (2010) | + | ♦ Louwerse M. (2010) |
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/louwerse.symbol-interdependency.topics10.pdf Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science,</i> 1-30, doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/louwerse.symbol-interdependency.topics10.pdf Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science,</i> 1-30, doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf slides]--><br> | ||
− | ♦ Dove G. (2011) | + | ♦ Dove G. (2011) |
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology,</i> 1:242, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 | [http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology,</i> 1:242, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 | ||
|- | |- | ||
Riadok 158: | Riadok 159: | ||
|Grounding abstract concepts. | |Grounding abstract concepts. | ||
| | | | ||
− | ♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018) | + | ♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018) |
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121<br> | [http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121<br> | ||
♦ Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018) | ♦ Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018) |
Verzia zo dňa a času 22:02, 11. september 2018
Grounded Cognition – 2-IKV-236/15
The course objective is to provide students with deeper insight into up-to-date research trends in cognitive science, from the perspective of various disciplines (psychological, neural and computational). The course focus is on grounded (embodied) cognition, and its relation to language. The course should also help students in their ability to interpret scientific papers, to formulate, present and defend ideas.
The course is a part of Master Programme in Cognitive Science.
News
- 11. 9. 2018
- We start on Tuesday, 25th September, at 10:00 in room I-23
Syllabus
Note: Papers marked with (*) are offered for student's presentation.
Date | Topic | References |
---|---|---|
25.09. | Introduction to language and key issues about concepts. |
♦ Wiki: Language |
02.10. | Toward embodied cognition. |
♦ Wilson M. (2002)
Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomics Bulletin Review, 9(4), 625-636. |
09.10. | Mirror neuron system and its role(s) in cognition. |
♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010)
The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 11, 264-274. |
16.10. | Common coding theory, motor simulation, mental simulation. |
♦ Smith A.H. (2006)
Motor cognition and mental simulation. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481. |
23.10. | Language as action. |
♦ Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002)
Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558-565. |
30.10. | Conceptual and linguistic systems - two theories. |
♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008)
Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 245-283. |
06.11. | Role(s) of language in cognition. |
♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009)
Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool. New Ideas in Psychology, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001 |
13.11. | Symbol grounding problem. |
♦ Steels L. (2008)
The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 223-244. |
20.11. | Meaning as statistical covariation. |
♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008)
Latent semantic analysis, Scholarpedia, 3(11):4356.
wiki |
27.12. | Unification attempts. |
♦ Louwerse M. (2010)
Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1-30, doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x |
04.12. | Grounding abstract concepts. |
♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018)
Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373: 20170121 |
11.12. | Reflection, discussion. | your mind |
Grading
- Activity during the semester (50%). This includes weekly submitting inputs to the moderator and an active participation during discussions.
- Paper presentation and moderation (30%). You will select a topic for presentation, collect the inputs from other students in advance, organize them (details will be explained) and you will moderate the discussion.
- Final reflection (20%). You will write a two-page essay, that will include answers to two points: 1. How you understood the main issues we dealt with (trying to include open questions, if any), 2. How the learnt content enriched your existing knowledge.
- Overall grading (in %): A > 90, B > 80, C > 70, D > 60, E > 50, else Fx.