Line 49: Line 49:
 
|-
 
|-
 
|(1) <br> 25.09.
 
|(1) <br> 25.09.
|Introduction to language and concepts.
+
|Introduction to language and concepts.  
<!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/lang-intro.4x.pdf slides]-->
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/lang-intro.4x.pdf slides1] [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/concepts-intro.4x.pdf slides2]
 
|
 
|
 
♦ Wiki: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language Language] <br>
 
♦ Wiki: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language Language] <br>
Line 63: Line 63:
 
♦ Ziemke T. (2003)  
 
♦ Ziemke T. (2003)  
 
[http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/244.pdf What's that thing called embodiment?]   
 
[http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/244.pdf What's that thing called embodiment?]   
<i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139.  
+
<i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139. <b>[Rapho]</b>
 
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/grujicic.ziemke.pdf">Lidija G.</a>)--><br>
 
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/grujicic.ziemke.pdf">Lidija G.</a>)--><br>
 
<!--♦ Barsalou L. (2008).  
 
<!--♦ Barsalou L. (2008).  
Line 72: Line 72:
 
|
 
|
 
♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010)  
 
♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010)  
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]-->  <br>
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]-->  <b>[Jaša]</b> <br>
 
♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014)  
 
♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014)  
[https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0169 Mirror neuron research: the past and the future.] <i>Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., </i>369: 20130169.<br>
+
[https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0169 Mirror neuron research: the past and the future.] <i>Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., </i>369: 20130169. <b>[Jakob]</b><br>
 
<!--Giese M. & Rizzolatti G. (2015).  
 
<!--Giese M. & Rizzolatti G. (2015).  
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/giese.visual-motor-reps.neuron15.pdf Neural and computational mechanisms of action processing: Interaction between visual and motor representations]. <i>Neuron,</i> 88, 167-180. -->
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/giese.visual-motor-reps.neuron15.pdf Neural and computational mechanisms of action processing: Interaction between visual and motor representations]. <i>Neuron,</i> 88, 167-180. -->
Line 88: Line 88:
 
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/knez.motor-cog.pdf">Simon K.</a>)<br-->
 
<!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/knez.motor-cog.pdf">Simon K.</a>)<br-->
 
♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013)  
 
♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013)  
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press <br>
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press <b>[Ela]</b> <br>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|(5) <br>23.10.
 
|(5) <br>23.10.
Line 95: Line 95:
 
<!--br>/ Indre <a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/indre.pileckyte.pdf">slides/a>--->
 
<!--br>/ Indre <a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/indre.pileckyte.pdf">slides/a>--->
 
|
 
|
♦ Martin H. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/fischer.emb-lang-review.qjep08.pdf Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension]. <i>The Quaterly  Journal of Exp. Psych.,</i> 61 (6), 825-850<br>
+
♦ Martin H. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/fischer.emb-lang-review.qjep08.pdf Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension]. <i>The Quaterly  Journal of Exp. Psych.,</i> 61 (6), 825-850 <b>[Alicja]</b><br>
 
<!--Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002)  
 
<!--Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002)  
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.lang-action.psychrevbul02.pdf Grounding language in action]. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,</i> 9(3), 558-565. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/glenberg.lang-action.4x.pdf slides]-->
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.lang-action.psychrevbul02.pdf Grounding language in action]. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,</i> 9(3), 558-565. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/glenberg.lang-action.4x.pdf slides]-->
Line 116: Line 116:
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 
♦ Evans V. (2009)  
 
♦ Evans V. (2009)  
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/evans.lccm.ch09.pdf Semantic representation in LCCM Theory]. In: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By V. Evans & S. Pourcel. John Benjamins.  
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/evans.lccm.ch09.pdf Semantic representation in LCCM Theory]. In: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By V. Evans & S. Pourcel. John Benjamins. <b>[Maša]</b>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|(7) <br>13.11.
 
|(7) <br>13.11.
Line 123: Line 123:
 
|
 
|
 
♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009)  
 
♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009)  
[http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001<br>
+
[http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001 <b>[Anna]</b><br>
 
♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015)  
 
♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015)  
 
[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00436/full Language and Cognition]. Lausanne: Frontiers Media. <br>
 
[https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00436/full Language and Cognition]. Lausanne: Frontiers Media. <br>
Line 131: Line 131:
 
|
 
|
 
♦ Steels L. (2008)
 
♦ Steels L. (2008)
[https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
+
[https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244. <b>[Maria]</b><!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 
♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013)  
 
♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013)  
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/coradeschi.sgp-review.ki13.pdf A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems]. <i>Künstliche Intelligenz</i>, 27:129–136 <br>
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/coradeschi.sgp-review.ki13.pdf A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems]. <i>Künstliche Intelligenz</i>, 27:129–136 <b>[Raffael]</b> <br>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|(9) <br>27.11.
 
|(9) <br>27.11.
Line 141: Line 141:
 
♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008)  
 
♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008)  
 
[http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Latent_semantic_analysis Latent semantic analysis],<i> Scholarpedia</i>, 3(11):4356.  
 
[http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Latent_semantic_analysis Latent semantic analysis],<i> Scholarpedia</i>, 3(11):4356.  
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki]<br>
+
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki] <b>[Aleš]</b> <br>
 
<!--♦ Louwerse M., Jeuniaux P. (2008)
 
<!--♦ Louwerse M., Jeuniaux P. (2008)
 
<a href="http://www.madresearchlab.org/references/LouwerseJeuniauxBookChapter08.pdf">
 
<a href="http://www.madresearchlab.org/references/LouwerseJeuniauxBookChapter08.pdf">
Line 148: Line 148:
 
OUP, 309-326.<br-->
 
OUP, 309-326.<br-->
 
♦ Glenberg, A. M., & Mehta, S. (2008)
 
♦ Glenberg, A. M., & Mehta, S. (2008)
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.covar-not-meaning.ling09.pdf Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning]. <i>Italian Journal of Linguistics,</i> 20, 33-53.<br>
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.covar-not-meaning.ling09.pdf Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning]. <i>Italian Journal of Linguistics,</i> 20, 33-53. <b>[Benjamin]</b> <br>
 
♦ Bruni E.,  Tran N.K., Baroni M. (2014)
 
♦ Bruni E.,  Tran N.K., Baroni M. (2014)
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/bruni.multimodal-distr-sem.jair14.pdf Multimodal distributional semantics]. <i>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</i>,  49, 1-47
+
[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/bruni.multimodal-distr-sem.jair14.pdf Multimodal distributional semantics]. <i>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</i>,  49, 1-47 <b>[Zoran]</b>
 
|-
 
|-
 
|(10) <br>04.12.
 
|(10) <br>04.12.
Line 165: Line 165:
 
|
 
|
 
♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018)  
 
♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018)  
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121<br>
+
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121 <b>[Lenart] [Maximilian]</b><br>
 
♦ Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018)  
 
♦ Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018)  
 
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144 Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170144
 
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144 Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170144

Revision as of 16:18, 25 September 2018

Grounded Cognition – 2-IKV-236/15

The course objective is to provide students with deeper insight into up-to-date research trends in cognitive science, from the perspective of various disciplines (psychological, neural and computational). The course focus is on grounded (embodied) cognition, and its relation to language. The course should also help students in their ability to interpret scientific papers, to formulate, present and defend ideas.

The course is a part of Master Programme in Cognitive Science.

News

11. 9. 2018
We start on Tuesday, 25th September, at 10:00 in room I-23


Syllabus

Note: Papers marked with (*) are offered for student's presentation.

Date Topic References
(1)
25.09.
Introduction to language and concepts.

slides1 slides2

♦ Wiki: Language
♦ Margolis E., Laurence S. (2014) Concepts, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

(2)
02.10.
Toward embodied cognition.

♦ Wilson M. (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomics Bulletin Review, 9(4), 625-636.
♦ Ziemke T. (2003) What's that thing called embodiment? Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society, 1134-1139. [Rapho]

(3)
09.10.
Mirror neuron system and its role(s) in cognition.

♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 11, 264-274. [Jaša]
♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014) Mirror neuron research: the past and the future. Philos. Trans. R Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 369: 20130169. [Jakob]

(4)
16.10.
Common coding theory, motor simulation, mental simulation.

♦ Smith A.H. (2006) Motor cognition and mental simulation. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481.
♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013) Action perception from a common coding perspective. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception, Oxford University Press [Ela]

(5)
23.10.
Language as action.

♦ Martin H. Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quaterly Journal of Exp. Psych., 61 (6), 825-850 [Alicja]
♦ Arbib M., Gasser B., Barrès V. (2014) Language is handy but is it embodied?. Neuropsychologia, 55, 57–70.

30.10. fall break no class
(6)
06.11.
Conceptual and linguistic systems - two theories.

♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 245-283.
♦ Evans V. (2009) Semantic representation in LCCM Theory. In: New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. By V. Evans & S. Pourcel. John Benjamins. [Maša]

(7)
13.11.
Role(s) of language in cognition.

♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009) Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool. New Ideas in Psychology, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001 [Anna]
♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015) Language and Cognition. Lausanne: Frontiers Media.

(8)
20.11.
Symbol grounding problem.

♦ Steels L. (2008) The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 223-244. [Maria]
♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013) A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems. Künstliche Intelligenz, 27:129–136 [Raffael]

(9)
27.11.
Meaning as statistical covariation.

♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008) Latent semantic analysis, Scholarpedia, 3(11):4356. wiki [Aleš]
♦ Glenberg, A. M., & Mehta, S. (2008) Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20, 33-53. [Benjamin]
♦ Bruni E., Tran N.K., Baroni M. (2014) Multimodal distributional semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 49, 1-47 [Zoran]

(10)
04.12.
Unification attempts.

♦ Louwerse M. (2010) Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1-30, doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01106.x
♦ Dove G. (2011) On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1:242, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242

(11)
11.12.
Grounding abstract concepts.

♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018) Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373: 20170121 [Lenart] [Maximilian]
♦ Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018) Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373: 20170144

(12)
18.12.
Group presentations, summary. available references


Grading

  • Activity during the semester (40%). This includes weekly submitting inputs to the moderator and an active participation during discussions.
  • Paper presentation and moderation (30%). You will select a topic for presentation (one of the papers in the syllabus), collect by email the inputs (two questions or discussion points) from other students in advance (until Sunday, 20:00), and organize them by topic. The inputs should be sent to the moderator, with the subject "author" (use the first author's surname). You will give a short intro and then moderate the discussion. The students will be divided into small groups.
  • Final group presentation (10%). You will prepare a group presentation (3-4 people) on a topic relevant for the course, something you would like to emphasize.
  • Final reflection (20%). You will write a two-page essay, that will include answers to two points: 1. How you understood the main issues we dealt with (trying to include open questions, if any), 2. How the learnt content enriched your existing knowledge.
  • Overall grading (in %): A > 90, B > 80, C > 70, D > 60, E > 50, else Fx.