(Cleaning out junk from last year (it is archived...))
Line 54: Line 54:
  
 
S druhou rozcvičkou boli trochu problémy, hlavne v korektnom zápise sledu argumentov. Jeden z môžných dôkazov nájdete v [[File:R02riesenie.pdf]]
 
S druhou rozcvičkou boli trochu problémy, hlavne v korektnom zápise sledu argumentov. Jeden z môžných dôkazov nájdete v [[File:R02riesenie.pdf]]
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<!-- Archived 2011/2012
 
 
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (course homepage)
 
 
*Lectures: Martin Baláž, Martin Homola
 
*Labs: Jozef Frtús
 
 
*Labs info: https://www.dai.fmph.uniba.sk/~frtus/kri/
 
*Evaluation: [https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AnoXnHbSHpPudHFJemVVWWpXaWw1bmN4VExxVjZtNWc Google Doc]
 
 
==Literature==
 
 
# [http://www.ii.fmph.uniba.sk/~sefranek/kniha/temp/fasada.pdf Šefránek, J. (2000). Inteligencia ako výpočet (p. 430). IRIS.]
 
 
== Evaluation ==
 
 
Evaluation points:
 
 
*Midterm: 15
 
*Exam: 40
 
*Project: 30
 
*Labs: 10
 
*TOTAL: 95
 
*BONUS: 10
 
 
Evaluation scale:
 
 
* 84 and more: A
 
* 75 and more: B
 
* 66 and more: C
 
* 57 and more: D
 
* 48 and more: E
 
 
== Project ==
 
 
The task of the project is to propose and describe a scenario for an application
 
of ambient intelligence based on knowledge representation formalisms and reasoning. Project will be submitted in three phases, each has separate deadline:
 
 
* Phase 1 - scenario description: 23 March
 
* Phase 2 - initial formalization: 27 April
 
* Phase 3 - final formalization: <strike>25 May</strike> 25 June (or the day your examination period ends for the finishing students)
 
 
Please upload your outputs for each phase here: http://wiki.matfyz.sk/KRR2012_Projekty
 
 
IMPORTANT: Basic information about Ambient Intelligence and three demo scenarios are described in: [[http://ii.fmph.uniba.sk/~sefranek/kri/bikakis-dke09.pdf Distributed Defeasible Reasoning in Ambient Intelligence]] by Bikakis et al.
 
 
An example of a successful project by Michal Antonič: http://ii.fmph.uniba.sk/~sefranek/kri/antonic_rzai_projekt.pdf
 
 
=== Project Evaluation ===
 
 
'''Phase 1 Scenario:'''
 
* description of an intelligent application/device together with the situation (background) in which it will be used     
 
* purpose of the application device: what problem it will solve, or what task it will fulfill
 
* informal example of how the problem/task will be solved, showing how reasoning will be used                                                 
 
                                                                                     
 
'''Phases 2 and 3:'''
 
* specification of the formalism that will be used
 
* list of symbols with intuitive description of their meanings (i.e., what values they represent in the scenario)
 
* formalization of the knowledge base: facts, rules, logic programs, etc. that will be needed to solve the problem, achieve the intelligent behavior described in the scenario
 
* problem solution: formal solution of the problem using reasoning with your knowledge base in the selected formalism
 
 
Hints:
 
* link the described formal knowledge base and solution with the respective part of the scenario in where this is informally described
 
* the formalization can address a suitable part of the informal scenario only, and the informal scenario can be modified if needed, but this must be explained in your document
 
* for Phase 2 the main part of the score is for formalization of the knowledge base, while in Phase 3 it is for the formal solution of the problem
 
-->
 

Revision as of 14:33, 5 March 2013

Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (course homepage)

  • Lectures: Martin Baláž, Martin Homola
  • Labs: Alexander Šimko

Course outline

  • From databases to KR&R
  • From deduction to hypothetical reasoning
  • Preferences
  • Knowledge revision
  • Induction
  • Abduction

Literature

  1. Šefránek, J. (2000). Inteligencia ako výpočet (p. 430). IRIS.

Evaluation

Evaluation points:

  • Midterm: 10
  • Exam: 30 (min 10)
  • Project: 25 (min 10)
  • Labs: 10 (min 3)
  • TOTAL: 75

Evaluation scale:

  • 67 and more: A
  • 59 and more: B
  • 52 and more: C
  • 45 and more: D
  • 39 and more: E

Project

TBA

Lecture Slides

Labs

S druhou rozcvičkou boli trochu problémy, hlavne v korektnom zápise sledu argumentov. Jeden z môžných dôkazov nájdete v Súbor:R02riesenie.pdf