Revision as of 22:06, 17 August 2021

Grounded Cognition – 2-IKV-236a/19

The course objective is to provide students with deeper insight into up-to-date research trends in cognitive science, from the perspective of various disciplines (psychological, neural and computational). The course focus is on grounded (embodied) cognition, and its relation to language. The course should also help students in their ability to interpret scientific papers, to formulate, present and defend ideas.

The course is a part of Master Programme in Cognitive Science.

Course schedule

Type	Day	Time	Room	Lecturer
Lecture	Tuesday	09:50 - 11:20	I-23	Igor Farkaš
Presentations	Tuesday	11:40 - 13:10	I-23	students

Syllabus

Date	Topic	References
(1) 22.09.	Introduction to language and concepts	♦ Wiki: Language ♦ Margolis E., Laurence S. (2014) Concepts, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
(2) 29.09.	Towards embodied cognition	♦ Wilson M. (2002) Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomics Bulletin Review, 9(4), 625-636. ♦ Ziemke T. (2003) What's that thing called embodiment? Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society, 1134-1139.
(3) 06.10.	Mirror neuron system and its role(s) in cognition	♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Rev. Neurosci., 11, 264-274. ♦ Rizzolatti G. et al. (2019) The Mirror Neuron Mechanism, Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology.
(4) 13.10.	Common coding theory, motor simulation, mental simulation	♦ Smith A.H. (2006) Motor cognition and mental simulation. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481. ♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013) Action perception from a common coding perspective. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception, Oxford University Press
(5) 20.10.	Language as action	♦ Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Exp. Psych., 61 (6), 825-850 ♦ Arbib M., Gasser B., Barrès V. (2014) Language is handy but is it embodied?. Neuropsychologia, 55, 57–70.
(6) 27.10.	Conceptual and linguistic systems - two theories	♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 245-283. ♦ Evans V. (2016) Design features for linguistically-mediated meaning construction: The relative roles of the linguistic and conceptual systems in subserving the ideational function of language. Frontiers in Psychology.
03.11.	no class	autumn break
(7) 10.11.	Meaning as statistical covariation	♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008) Latent semantic analysis, Scholarpedia, 3(11):4356. wiki ♦ Glenberg, A. M., & Mehta, S. (2008) Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 20, 33-53. ♦ Bruni E., Tran N.K., Baroni M. (2014) Multimodal distributional semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 49, 1-47
(8) 17.11.	Symbol grounding problem	♦ Steels L. (2008) The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition, OUP, 223-244. ♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013) A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems. Künstliche Intelligenz, 27:129–136
(9) 24.11.	Unification attempts	♦ Louwerse M. (2010) Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1-30 ♦ Dove G. (2011) On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1:242
(10) 01.12.	Role(s) of language in cognition and thought	♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009) Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool. New Ideas in Psychology, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001 ♦ Hendricks R. K., Boroditsky L. (2017). New Space–Time Metaphors Foster New Nonlinguistic Representations. Topics in Cognitive Science.
(11) 08.12.	Grounding abstract concepts. Summary.	♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018) Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373: 20170121 ♦ Pulvermüller F. (2018) The case of CAUSE: neurobiological mechanisms for grounding an abstract concept. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 373: 20170129
(12) 15.12.	Paper presentation	Prepare a short presentation of the topic you plan to write about, using a few slides (max. 4), focusing on the main message you want to convey.

Grading

Activity during the semester (30%). This includes weekly submitting inputs to the moderator and an active participation during discussions.
Paper presentation and moderation (30%). You will select a topic for presentation (one of the papers in the syllabus), collect by email the inputs (one question or a discussion point) from other students in advance (until Saturday, 20:00), and organize them by topic. The inputs should be sent to the moderator, with the subject "author" (use the first author's surname). The moderator sends sorted questions to all students by Monday 17:00 to all students (and teachers), so that they have some time to think of them. The moderation will give a short intro in the class and then moderate the discussion.
Final paper (30%). You will write a 4-page (conference) paper in PDF (40 lines per page, single column, including references), on the topic of your choice (from the 12 topics during the course), appropriately extended (including additional references). Deadline: 15.1.2021.
Final paper presentation (10%). You will prepare a short presentation (8 min.) of your paper.
Overall grading (in %): A > 90, B > 80, C > 70, D > 60, E > 50, else Fx.

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 |09:50 - 11:20
 |I-23
-|[[Igor Farkas|Igor Farkaš]],[[Kristina Rebrova|Kristína Malinovská]]
+|[[Igor Farkas|Igor Farkaš]]
 |-
 |Presentations
@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 |
 ♦ Wiki: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language Language] <br>
-♦ Margolis E., Laurence S. (2014)  [Igor]
+♦ Margolis E., Laurence S. (2014)
 [https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/ Concepts], The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <br>
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 |
 ♦ Wilson M. (2002)
-[http://www.indiana.edu/~cogdev/labwork/WilsonSixViewsofEmbodiedCog.pdf Six views of embodied cognition]. <i>Psychonomics Bulletin Review,</i> 9(4), 625-636.  [Kika]
+[http://www.indiana.edu/~cogdev/labwork/WilsonSixViewsofEmbodiedCog.pdf Six views of embodied cognition]. <i>Psychonomics Bulletin Review,</i> 9(4), 625-636.
 <!-- [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/wilson.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 ♦ Ziemke T. (2003)
 [http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/244.pdf What's that thing called embodiment?]
-<i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139.  <b>(Nina)</b>
+<i>Proc. of the 25th Annual Conf. of the Cog. Sci. Society</i>, 1134-1139.
 <!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/grujicic.ziemke.pdf">Lidija G.</a>)--><br>
 <!--♦ Barsalou L. (2008).
@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 |
 ♦ Rizzolatti G. & Sinigaglia C. (2010)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274.  [Igor] <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]-->  <br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/rizzolatti.mns.nrn10.pdf The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 11, 264-274. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/mns.4x.pdf slides]-->  <br>
-♦ Rizzolatti G. et al. (2019) [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332135641_The_Mirror_Neuron_Mechanism The Mirror Neuron Mechanism], Reference Module in <i>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology.</i><b>(Sinem)</b> <br>
+♦ Rizzolatti G. et al. (2019) [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332135641_The_Mirror_Neuron_Mechanism The Mirror Neuron Mechanism], Reference Module in <i>Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology.</i> <br>
 <!--♦ Casile A., Caggiano V., Ferrari P.F. (2011) [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/casile-etal.mns.nsci11.pdf  The Mirror Neuron System: A Fresh View.] <i>The Neuroscientist,</i> 17(5): 524-38. <b>(XX)</b-->
 <!--♦ Ferrari PF, Rizzolatti G. (2014)
@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/jeannerod.simul-action.nimg01.pdf Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition], <i>NeuroImage</i>, 14, 103–109, doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0832  <br>-->
 ♦ Smith A.H. (2006)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/smith.motor-cogn-simul.chap06.pdf Motor cognition and mental simulation]. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481.  [Kika]<!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/motor-cognition.4x.pdf slides]-->    <br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/smith.motor-cogn-simul.chap06.pdf Motor cognition and mental simulation]. Chapter in Smith E. & Kosslyn S. (eds.): Cognitive Psychology: Mind and Brain, Prentice Hall, pp. 451-481.  <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/motor-cognition.4x.pdf slides]-->    <br>
 <!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/knez.motor-cog.pdf">Simon K.</a>)<br-->
 ♦ van der Wel R., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. (2013)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press   <b>(Andre)</b> <br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/vanderwel.common-coding.xx11.pdf Action perception from a common coding perspective]. Chapter in K. Johnson and M. Schiffrar (Eds.), <i>People Watching: Social, Perceptual, and Neurophysiological Studies of Body Perception</i>, Oxford University Press  <br>
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
 |-
@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 <!--br>/ Indre <a href="courses/GroundedCog/Slides/indre.pileckyte.pdf">slides/a>--->
 |
-♦ Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/fischer.emb-lang-review.qjep08.pdf Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension]. <i>The Quaterly  Journal of Exp. Psych.,</i> 61 (6), 825-850  [Kika] <br>
+♦ Fischer M.H., Zwaan R.A. (2008) [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/fischer.emb-lang-review.qjep08.pdf Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension]. <i>The Quarterly  Journal of Exp. Psych.,</i> 61 (6), 825-850  <br>
 <!--Glenberg A. & Kaschak M. (2002)
 [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.lang-action.psychrevbul02.pdf Grounding language in action]. <i>Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,</i> 9(3), 558-565. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/glenberg.lang-action.4x.pdf slides]-->
@@ Line 108: / Line 108: @@
 [http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/pulvermueller.lang-action.nrn05.pdf Brain mechanisms linking language and action]. <i>Nature Rev. Neurosci.,</i> 6(7), 576-582.<br>-->
 ♦ Arbib M., Gasser B., Barrès V. (2014)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/arbib.lang-emb.npsy14.pdf Language is handy but is it embodied?]. <i>Neuropsychologia,</i> 55, 57–70.  <b>(David)</b>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/arbib.lang-emb.npsy14.pdf Language is handy but is it embodied?]. <i>Neuropsychologia,</i> 55, 57–70.
 <!--(<a href="courses/GroundedCog/Moderation/reichl.arbib.pdf">Dominik R.</a>)<br-->
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
@@ Line 118: / Line 118: @@
 |
 ♦ Barsalou L. et al. (2008)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283.  [Igor] <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/barsalou.lang-simul.ch08.pdf Language and simulation in conceptual processing]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition</i>, OUP, 245-283.  <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/barsalou.lass.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
-♦ Evans V. (2016) [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156 Design features for linguistically-mediated meaning construction: The relative roles of the linguistic and conceptual systems in subserving the ideational function of language]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology.</i>  <b>(Vanesa)</b>
+♦ Evans V. (2016) [https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00156 Design features for linguistically-mediated meaning construction: The relative roles of the linguistic and conceptual systems in subserving the ideational function of language]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology.</i>
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
 |-
@@ Line 133: / Line 133: @@
 ♦ Landauer T., Dumais D. (2008)
 [http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Latent_semantic_analysis Latent semantic analysis],<i> Scholarpedia</i>, 3(11):4356.
-[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki]  [Igor] <br>
+[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis wiki]  <br>
 <!--♦ Louwerse M., Jeuniaux P. (2008)
 <a href="http://www.madresearchlab.org/references/LouwerseJeuniauxBookChapter08.pdf">
@@ Line 139: / Line 139: @@
 In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds) <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition.</i> OUP, 309-326.<br-->
 ♦ Glenberg, A. M., & Mehta, S. (2008)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.covar-not-meaning.ling09.pdf Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning]. <i>Italian Journal of Linguistics,</i> 20, 33-53. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/covariation.4x.pdf slides]--> <b>(Niko)</b><br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/glenberg.covar-not-meaning.ling09.pdf Constraint on covariation: It’s not meaning]. <i>Italian Journal of Linguistics,</i> 20, 33-53. <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/covariation.4x.pdf slides]--> <br>
 ♦ Bruni E.,  Tran N.K., Baroni M. (2014)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/bruni.multimodal-distr-sem.jair14.pdf Multimodal distributional semantics]. <i>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</i>,  49, 1-47 <b>(Veronika)</b>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/bruni.multimodal-distr-sem.jair14.pdf Multimodal distributional semantics]. <i>Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research</i>,  49, 1-47
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
 |-
@@ Line 148: / Line 148: @@
 |
 ♦ Steels L. (2008)
-[https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244.  [Kika]<!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
+[https://ai.vub.ac.be/sites/default/files/steels-08e.pdf The symbol grounding problem has been solved, so what’s next?]. In: de Vega, Glenberg & Graesser (eds), <i>Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition,</i> OUP, 223-244.  <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/steels.grounding.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 ♦ Coradeschi S., Loutfi A., Wrede B. (2013)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/coradeschi.sgp-review.ki13.pdf A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems]. <i>Künstliche Intelligenz</i>, 27:129–136  <b>(Jan-Ove)</b> <br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/coradeschi.sgp-review.ki13.pdf A short review of symbol grounding in robotic and intelligent systems]. <i>Künstliche Intelligenz</i>, 27:129–136 <br>
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
 |-
@@ Line 158: / Line 158: @@
 |
 ♦ Louwerse M. (2010)
-[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/louwerse.symbol-interdependency.topics10.pdf Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science,</i> 1-30  [Igor] <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
+[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/References/louwerse.symbol-interdependency.topics10.pdf Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science,</i> 1-30  <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/louwerse.sihypo.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
 ♦ Dove G. (2011)
-[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology,</i> 1:242 <b>(Lena)</b>
+[http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00242 On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition]. <i>Frontiers in Psychology,</i> 1:242
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
 |-
@@ Line 168: / Line 168: @@
 |
 ♦ Mirolli M., Parisi D. (2009)
-[http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001  [Kika] <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/vygotsky-cog-rob.4x.pdf slides]--> <br>
+[http://laral.istc.cnr.it/mirolli/papers/MirolliParisi2011TowardsVygotskyanCognitiveRobotics.pdf Towards a Vygotskyan cognitive robotics: The role of language as a cognitive tool]. <i>New Ideas in Psychology</i>, doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.001  <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/vygotsky-cog-rob.4x.pdf slides]--> <br>
-♦ Hendricks R. K., Boroditsky L. (2017). [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12279 New Space–Time Metaphors Foster New Nonlinguistic Representations]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science.</i><b>(Marko)</b><br>
+♦ Hendricks R. K., Boroditsky L. (2017). [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12279 New Space–Time Metaphors Foster New Nonlinguistic Representations]. <i>Topics in Cognitive Science.</i><br>
-<!--♦ Ohta S., Fukui N., Sakai K. (2013) [https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00204 Computational principles of syntax in the regions specialized for language: integrating theoretical linguistics and functional neuroimaging], <i>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience</i>, <b>(XXX)</b>  <br>
+<!--♦ Ohta S., Fukui N., Sakai K. (2013) [https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00204 Computational principles of syntax in the regions specialized for language: integrating theoretical linguistics and functional neuroimaging], <i>Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience</i>, <br>
 ♦ Sakai, K.L., Perlovsky, L., eds. (2015) [https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00436/full Language and Cognition]. Lausanne: Frontiers Media. The articles can be found [http://mind.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/Sakai_Lab_files/Papers/Language_and_Cognition_2015.PDF here].<br-->
 <!--=============================================================================================-->
@@ Line 178: / Line 178: @@
 |
 ♦Borghi A.M., Barca L., Binkofski F., Tummolini L. (2018)
-[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121 <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/abstractness.4x.pdf slides]--><b>(Surya)</b> <br>
+[http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0121 Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170121 <!--[http://dai.fmph.uniba.sk/courses/GC/Slides/abstractness.4x.pdf slides]--><br>
-♦ Pulvermüller F. (2018) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0129 The case of CAUSE: neurobiological mechanisms for grounding an abstract concept.] <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170129 <b>(Primož)</b>
+♦ Pulvermüller F. (2018) [http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0129 The case of CAUSE: neurobiological mechanisms for grounding an abstract concept.] <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170129
 <!--Barsalou L.W., Dutriaux L., Scheepers C. (2018)
 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144 Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts]. <i>Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B</i>, 373: 20170144 -->

Department of Applied Informatics

Revision as of 22:06, 17 August 2021

Grounded Cognition – 2-IKV-236a/19

Contents

Course schedule

Syllabus

Grading