(→Syllabus) |
|||
| (61 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{CourseHeader | |
| − | = | + | | code = 2-IKV-921 |
| + | | title = Diploma thesis seminar | ||
| + | }} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
| Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
<b>Learning outcomes:</b> After the course, you should be able to: (1) to formulate and follow a scientific question relevant to cognitive science, (2) to plan, conduct, document and present scientific work, (3) to write an extended scientific abstract, (4) to defend your research and constructively deal with critical commentary, (5) to constructively participate in a peer-review process, (6) to get involved in collaborative work in physical and virtual environments, (7) to engage in scientific discourse, (8) to communicate your expertise in order to contribute constructive criticism to the work of others. | <b>Learning outcomes:</b> After the course, you should be able to: (1) to formulate and follow a scientific question relevant to cognitive science, (2) to plan, conduct, document and present scientific work, (3) to write an extended scientific abstract, (4) to defend your research and constructively deal with critical commentary, (5) to constructively participate in a peer-review process, (6) to get involved in collaborative work in physical and virtual environments, (7) to engage in scientific discourse, (8) to communicate your expertise in order to contribute constructive criticism to the work of others. | ||
| + | <!-- | ||
== News == | == News == | ||
| + | ;10.2.2020 | ||
| + | :We start on Wednesday 19.2.2020 with an organizational meeting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | <!-- | ||
;23. 3. 2017 | ;23. 3. 2017 | ||
: In your longer presentation (20-25 min + 10 min discussion), focus on the following: (1) motivation (state-of-the-art in the area of your focus, brief survey of related approaches); (2) research question (is it well formulated?); (3) assumptions behind your approach; (4) experimental design / computational model specification. | : In your longer presentation (20-25 min + 10 min discussion), focus on the following: (1) motivation (state-of-the-art in the area of your focus, brief survey of related approaches); (2) research question (is it well formulated?); (3) assumptions behind your approach; (4) experimental design / computational model specification. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ;30.4.2017 | ||
| + | : Deadline for submitting the master thesis concept postponed to May 7th (sharp).--> | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Schedule == | ||
| + | {| class="alternative table-responsive" | ||
| + | !Druh výučby | ||
| + | !Day | ||
| + | !Time | ||
| + | !Room | ||
| + | !Teacher | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |Seminar | ||
| + | |Wednesday | ||
| + | |14:00 - 16:20 | ||
| + | |online | ||
| + | |[[Igor Farkas|Igor Farkaš]], [[Barbora Cimrova|Barbora Cimrová]] | ||
| + | |} | ||
== Syllabus == | == Syllabus == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 42: | ||
!Content | !Content | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |16.2. |
|Introduction to the course, requirements and grading, plan for the semester. | |Introduction to the course, requirements and grading, plan for the semester. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |24.2. |
| − | | | + | |Joint meeting with 1st year students: presentations of your mobility projects. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |02.3. |
| − | | | + | |Introduction of Master's Thesis Concept. |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |09.3. |
| − | | | + | |Discussion about interdisciplinarity: Thagard (2005), short presentations (Rohil, Beata, Zuzka, Veronika) |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |16.3. |
| − | | | + | |no class |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |23.3. |
| − | | | + | |Discussion about interdisciplinarity: Nunez et al. (2019), long presentation (Rohil), short presentations (Emil, Elisabet) |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |30.3. |
| − | | | + | |Long presentation: Beata, TBA |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |06.4 |
| − | | | + | |Long presentations: xxx |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |13.4. | ||
| + | |Long presentations: xxx | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |20.4. | ||
| + | |TBA | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |27.4. |
| − | | | + | |No class (students' scientific conference) |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |02.5. |
|TBA | |TBA | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |09.5. |
|TBA | |TBA | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |08.6. |
| − | | | + | |Rehearsal of MEi:CogSci conference talks: group 1 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | | | + | |15.6. |
| − | | | + | |Rehearsal of MEi:CogSci conference talks: group 2 |
|} | |} | ||
== Course requirements and grading == | == Course requirements and grading == | ||
| − | * 40% - quality of the master thesis concept (following the template provided) | + | * 40% - quality of the master thesis concept (following the template provided) - to be submitted until April, 30th. |
| − | * 30% - oral presentations of your thesis in the seminar ( | + | * 30% - oral presentations of your thesis in the seminar (shorter and longer) |
| − | * 20% - activity, peer feedback, participation in | + | * 20% - activity during the semester, peer feedback, participation in peer reviews of extended abstracts (for the conference) |
* 10% - active participation at MEi:CogSci conference (talk) | * 10% - active participation at MEi:CogSci conference (talk) | ||
| − | * <b>Overall score:</b> A > 90%, B > 80%, C > 70%, D > 60%, E > 50%, | + | * <b>Overall score:</b> A > 90%, B > 80%, C > 70%, D > 60%, E > 50%, otherwise Fx. |
Revision as of 23:18, 28 March 2022
Diploma thesis seminar 2-IKV-921
Contents
The purpose of this interdisciplinary course is to provide support to students writing their master thesis in the fields of cognitive science. Students are expected to develop the concept for their master’s thesis, present and discuss their plans for their theses, issues and problems. The course provides room both for presentations and discussions. It also includes participation in the MEi:CogSci conference.
Learning outcomes: After the course, you should be able to: (1) to formulate and follow a scientific question relevant to cognitive science, (2) to plan, conduct, document and present scientific work, (3) to write an extended scientific abstract, (4) to defend your research and constructively deal with critical commentary, (5) to constructively participate in a peer-review process, (6) to get involved in collaborative work in physical and virtual environments, (7) to engage in scientific discourse, (8) to communicate your expertise in order to contribute constructive criticism to the work of others.
Schedule
| Druh výučby | Day | Time | Room | Teacher |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seminar | Wednesday | 14:00 - 16:20 | online | Igor Farkaš, Barbora Cimrová |
Syllabus
| Date | Content |
|---|---|
| 16.2. | Introduction to the course, requirements and grading, plan for the semester. |
| 24.2. | Joint meeting with 1st year students: presentations of your mobility projects. |
| 02.3. | Introduction of Master's Thesis Concept. |
| 09.3. | Discussion about interdisciplinarity: Thagard (2005), short presentations (Rohil, Beata, Zuzka, Veronika) |
| 16.3. | no class |
| 23.3. | Discussion about interdisciplinarity: Nunez et al. (2019), long presentation (Rohil), short presentations (Emil, Elisabet) |
| 30.3. | Long presentation: Beata, TBA |
| 06.4 | Long presentations: xxx |
| 13.4. | Long presentations: xxx |
| 20.4. | TBA |
| 27.4. | No class (students' scientific conference) |
| 02.5. | TBA |
| 09.5. | TBA |
| 08.6. | Rehearsal of MEi:CogSci conference talks: group 1 |
| 15.6. | Rehearsal of MEi:CogSci conference talks: group 2 |
Course requirements and grading
- 40% - quality of the master thesis concept (following the template provided) - to be submitted until April, 30th.
- 30% - oral presentations of your thesis in the seminar (shorter and longer)
- 20% - activity during the semester, peer feedback, participation in peer reviews of extended abstracts (for the conference)
- 10% - active participation at MEi:CogSci conference (talk)
- Overall score: A > 90%, B > 80%, C > 70%, D > 60%, E > 50%, otherwise Fx.